A Review Of trade secret case law
A Review Of trade secret case law
Blog Article
However, the above observation is without prejudice for the legal rights in the parties, arising out in the over marriage from the few, if any, pending before the competent court of legislation. Read more
The main objectives of police is always to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and previously mentioned all make sure regulation and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this can be a free and democratic state, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents of the boy or girl usually do not approve of these kinds of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they are able to do if they're able to Slash off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male that is a major, the few is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who offers this sort of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to activity by instituting criminal proceedings from the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against this kind of person(s) as provided by legislation.
The ruling with the first court created case regulation that must be followed by other courts until finally or unless possibly new regulation is created, or maybe a higher court rules differently.
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued into the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and inside the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
The proposal seems to be reasonable and acceded to. Within the meantime police shall remain neutral while in the private dispute between the parties, however, if any of the individuals is indulged in criminal action the police shall acquire prompt action against them under legislation. 5. The instant petition is disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
In the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court is definitely the highest court while in the United States. Reduced courts on the federal level include things like the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, as well as the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts listen to cases involving matters related on the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that include parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Each individual state has its possess judicial system that consists of trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Each individual state is frequently referred to because the “supreme” court, although there are a few exceptions to this rule, for example, the Ny Court of Appeals or maybe the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally hear cases involving state constitutional matters, state legislation and regulations, although state courts can also generally listen to cases involving federal laws.
Because of this, only citing the case is more prone to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Consider it as calling a person to tell them you’ve found their dropped phone, then telling them you live in these types of-and-these neighborhood, without actually providing them an address. Driving throughout the neighborhood seeking to find their phone is probably going for being more frustrating than it’s well worth.
10. Without touching the merits of your case on the issue of once-a-year increases during the pensionary emoluments from the petitioner, in terms of policy decision of your provincial government, these types of once-a-year increase, if permissible during the case of employees of KMC, demands further assessment to generally be made because of the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance because of funding issues and insufficient adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, necessitating the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle set up by a court, which other courts are obligated to comply with.
Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The law enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair for the offender and also the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation here have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts but they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The plenty of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
Any court could find to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to achieve a different conclusion. The validity of this type of distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to a higher court.
171 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually properly proven now that the provision for proforma promotion is just not alien or unfamiliar into the civil servant service construction but it's already embedded in Fundamental Rule seventeen, wherein it is actually lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority might if glad that a civil servant who was entitled to be promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his possess, wrongfully prevented from rendering service to your Federation/ province during the higher post, direct that this kind of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of pay out and allowances of such higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is usually a properly-recognized proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is subject to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.